               
L A Y A !
[ e L e t t e r f o r A m e r i c a n Y o u n g A d u l t s ]
h t t p : / / w w w . l a y a . c o m
<<>>><<<>>><<<>>><<<>>><<<>>><<<>>><<<>>><<<>>><<<>>><<<>>><<<>>><<<>>
VOLUME III ISSUE 3 MARCH 1998
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- A WORD FROM THE PRESIDENT
- THE EVOLUTION OF A LIFESTYLE (PART 2 of 4)
- THE EMPHASIS OF PUNCTUATION
- WHAT IF MICROSOFT BUILT CARS
- POLITICALLY CORRECT WAYS / STUPID
L A Y A ! looks best when viewed with 10 point Arial font.
<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>
A W O R D F R O M T H E P R E S I D E N T
<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>
Hello!
You may have already noticed that we have a joke in this issue entitled,
"What if Microsoft Built Cars?" Well, the funny thing is that they're
getting there. Microsoft has these neat little computers that control
your car's CD player, GPS unit, etc. Personally, I'd love to drive one
of those around. Well, except for the imminent danger of the computer
freezing and thus causing a car crash. If collision rates suddenly rise
around the third quarter of 1998, don't say I didn't warn you. We know
what happened.
The one happy result of this is that Apple doesn't and probably won't
come out with a car computer. If Apple did come out with one, we'd only
be able to operate the engine when the gas valve was off (think: can I
print while editing documents on a Mac?) The one other thing I was
thinking about is the huge potential of Microsoft's OnNow (in Windows
98, one can supposedly turn on their computer instantly). Hopefully an
automobile's PC will support this feature. It would be a huge drag to
have to spend a minute booting up a
car before using it. I keep wondering, is this a good thing or a bad
thing?
As they say, only time can tell. Anyhow-
Enjoy the issue!
Robert Chin
robert@laya.com
<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>
T H E E V O L U T I O N O F A L I F E S T Y L E
<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>
PART 2 of 4
Over the decades, life as a teen has changed dramatically (to say the
least). From Flower Power to political correctness, from "when I was
your age…" to "kids have it too easy nowadays." On the contrary though,
many parents of current teens NEVER say, "When I was your age, I went to
bed at two in the morning," or "When I was your age, I had to do
community service to graduate from high school." As a matter of fact, a
number of parents haven't even heard about this new-fangled "community
service." For as long as technology's impact on life increases,
student's lives will become more and more complex. Computers,
calculators, and spell checks will dominate, homework and community
service requirements will expand, and social lives will flourish.
Therefore, it is only logical that sleeping time will be condensed as
time goes on.
As I progress through the schooling required for every American kid, I
find that the homework scene continues to bewilder me. And don't forget
the community volunteering "requirements," which are even more
confusing. In kindergarten, I was perfectly happy when coloring
pictures of pink bunny rabbits or when using building blocks to create
my version of the Statue of Liberty. Even for the next six years in
elementary school, it was satisfying to complete the latest school
project, whether it was drawing a map of the United States (in scale!)
or dressing up like a famous historical personage. But when I found
myself baking cookies for history, building toothpick models of Greek
temples, or utilizing my coloring abilities in any way, begin to wonder
just how much I've progressed in the institution of knowledge over the
years.
And although I admit that I love art and everything relating, I am not
devoting all four years of my high school life to it, only to find
myself being deducted points for not coloring the Pacific Ocean blue.
After all, aren't teachers attempting to stress student creativity?
Isn't that why I kill myself (figuratively) in order to finish every
single useless group project? (In which one person ALWAYS ends up doing
all the work...guess whom?) I understand that the latest trends in
teaching are the interactive activities that supposedly prepare us
students for life after school. That means less memorizing and more
"hands-on" work-like community service.
Isn't volunteer work supposed to be voluntary? Pardon me, but I don't
seem to be capable of grasping the concept of required volunteer work.
True, colleges look for excessive community service hours in order to
find and recruit those who lack social lives, but for high school
graduation requirements?
For example, at Los Altos High School, each and every freshman must
complete an hour of community service per month from November through
May. But somewhere along the line, one needs to do a few extra hours in
order to meet the total of ten hours. I know, I know. The school's
trying to improve their image by making its students become "more
involved in the community." But for some reason, this makes me feel
like someone who has committed an extremely petty crime and is sentenced
to a ten-hour service penalty.
Overall, I'm not telling every teacher out there to retrogress back
towards the once popular "lecture and note-taking" learning method. But
as food for thought, perhaps it's time that everyone recognized today's
teaching strategies as tomorrow's future workplace ideas (watch out,
Dilbert!)
By: Serena Chang
serena@laya.com
<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>
T H E E M P H A S I S O F P U N C T U A T I O N
<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>
Have you ever stopped to think about how punctuation affects a
writer's work?! How much it changes the 'emphasis' of a sentence, the
'feeling' it gives to a story...? Through punctuation, we can _convey_
a sense of completion. We can also leave a question open for
suggestions..?
Or, we can give a list and have it continue on into an abyss... The
sentences of today are filled with commas, quotations, parenthesis,
etc., and other delimiting marks that give a piece its own feeling,
sometimes totally different from what a writer may intend!!! Why do we
want to -bother- with punctuation?!! Because a good writer can use
punctuation to his or her 'advantage'... That previous question may
have
been an *excellent* question, but an even *smarter* question would be:
why did I even write this article?!! For what purpose does it serve...?
As a matter of fact, this article serves no purpose at all! Believe it
or
not, enjoy the punctuated equilibrium while it lasts! This comical
humor(!) will not last long(?).
I can almost guarantee you that the <previous> paragraph was the
most jam-packed paragraph with question marks(?), exclamation marks(!),
and periods(.) you've ever seen. Enjoy!
By: Robert Chin
robert@laya.com
<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>
W H A T I F M I C R O S O F T B U I L T C A R S
<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>
If Microsoft built cars...
1. Every time they repainted the lines on the road, you'd have to buy a
new car.
2. Occasionally your car would just die on the motorway for no reason,
and you'd have to restart it. For some strange reason, you'd just accept
this, restart, and drive on.
3. Occasionally, executing a maneuver would cause your car to stop and
fail to restart and you'd have to re-install the engine. For some
strange reason, you'd just accept this too.
4. You could only have one person in the car at a time, unless you
bought a "Car 95" or a "Car NT." But then you'd have to buy more seats.
5. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was twice as
reliable, five times as fast, twice as easy to drive - but it would only
run on five percent of the roads.
6. The Macintosh car owners would get expensive Microsoft upgrades to
their cars which would make their cars go much slower.
7. The oil, engine, gas and alternator warning lights would be replaced
with a single "General Car Fault" warning light.
8. People would get excited about the "new" features in Microsoft cars,
forgetting completely that they had been available in other cars for
many years.
9. We'd all have to switch to Microsoft gas and auto fluids, but the
packaging would be superb.
10. New seats would force everyone to have the same size butt.
11.The airbag system would say "Are you sure?" before inflating.
12. If you were involved in a crash, you would have no idea what
happened.
13. They wouldn't build their own engines, but would instead form a
cartel with their engine suppliers. The latest engine would have sixteen
cylinders, multi-point fuel injection, and four turbos, but it would be
a side-valve design so that you could use Model-T Ford parts in it.
14. There would be an "Engium Pro" with bigger turbos, but it would be
slower on most existing roads.
15. Microsoft cars would have a special radio/cassette player which
would only be able to listen to Microsoft FM and play Microsoft
cassettes. Unless, of course, you buy the upgrade to use the existing
stuff.
16. Microsoft would do extremely well, because even though they don't
own any roads, all of the road manufacturers would give away Microsoft
cars free-including IBM!
17. If you still ran old versions of cars (i.e. CarDOS 6.22, CarWIN
3.11), then you would be called old fashioned, but you would be able to
drive much faster-and on more roads!
18. If you couldn't afford to buy a new car, then you could just borrow
your friend's-and then copy it.
19. Whenever you bought a car, you would have to reorganize the ignition
for a few days before it worked.
20. You would need to buy an upgrade to run cars on motorways next to
each other.
<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>
P O L I T I C A L L Y C O R R E C T W A Y S / S T U P I D
<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>
36 politically correct ways to say someone is stupid:
A few clowns short of a circus.
A few fries short of a Happy Meal.
An experiment in artificial stupidity.
A few beers short of a six-pack.
Dumber than a box of hair.
A few peas short of a casserole.
Doesn't have all his cornflakes in one box.
One taco short of a combination plate.
The cheese slid off his cracker.
Has an IQ of 2, but it takes 3 to grunt.
Couldn't pour water out of a boot with instructions on the heel.
He fell out of the Stupid tree and hit every branch on the way down.
An intellect rivaled only by garden tools.
As smart as bait.
Chimney's clogged.
Doesn't have all his dogs on one leash.
Doesn't know much, but leads the league in nostril hair.
Elevator doesn't go all the way to the top floor.
Forgot to pay his brain bill.
Her sewing machine's out of thread.
His antenna doesn't pick up all the channels.
His belt doesn't go through all the loops.
If he had another brain, it would be lonely.
Missing a few buttons on his remote control.
No grain in the silo.
Proof that evolution CAN go in reverse.
Receiver is off the hook.
Skylight leaks a little.
Slinky's kinked.
Too much yardage between the goal posts.
======================================================================
======================================================================
L A Y A ' s S T A F F . . .
Robert Chin
President
robert@laya.com
Daniel Cheng
Layout & Design
daniel@laya.com
Chris Lin
Perspective Editor
chris@laya.com
Serena Chang
Editor/Lead Writer
serena@laya.com
**********************************************************************
If you have questions, comments, or suggestions, please e-mail
"info@laya.com"
**********************************************************************
SUBMIT AN ARTICLE! E-mail "submissions@laya.com" with your article.
If this article was not written by you, we'd like to know who wrote
it and what their e-mail address is. If it is your article, please
include your name and your e-mail address. Your article may also be
published anonymously (please tell us this in the e-mail).
The article should be appropriate for 7-12th graders.
**********************************************************************
TO SUBSCRIBE A FRIEND, e-mail "listserv@laya.com" with any subject,
and in the message write "subscribe " (without the quotation marks,
respectively) and then your friend's e-mail address.
Or, you may subscribe through http://www.laya.com
For example: subscribe anonymous@anon.com
**********************************************************************
TO BE REMOVED FROM THIS SUBSCRIPTION, e-mail "listserv@laya.com" with
any subject, and in the message, write "unsubscribe" (without the
quotation marks, respectively)
**********************************************************************
ARTICLE REPRINT REQUESTS of this and back issues may be sent to
webmaster@laya.com
Mailing lists will NOT be given out, with NO exceptions.
**********************************************************************
~~~~~
LAYA!
~~~~~
(c) copyright 1998 by LAYA!
                |